Welcome to LibertyGarden.com
Search  
Main Menu  

  
All topics

Bullet9 Abundance Ecology | Bullet9 Private Property

Abundance Ecology

Achieving Abundance Ecology requires a direct relationship between man and the land, Abundance Ecologist Michael Shaw said in a presentation to the Trans-Heritage Association annual meeting and conference in Alpine Texas in May 2003. Shaw speaks from experience. Shaw has received acclaim for creating an ecological oasis from a blighted 75-acre parcel o­n the central coast of California -- what he calls "Liberty Garden."

"To release the potential productivity and diversity of a landscape, an owner must be free to engage in rigorous disturbance, and free to pursue a reasoned and creative process of trial and error. This process would be suited to the choice of each individual and the uniqueness of each property," Shaw said.

   Bullet9 What is Abundance Ecology?  |  Bullet9 Releasing the Native Seedbank  |  Bullet9 Demonstrating the moral and practical nature of Abundance Ecology  |  Bullet9 Seeds of Change
Private Property
Freedom associates authority with responsibility. In a society that respects individual liberty and private property, a property owner has every incentive to use his property wisely and well.   Bullet9 After Decades of Abuse - The Challenge to Restore Property Rights in California  |  Bullet9 What is Private Property?  |  Bullet9 The Necessity of Government  |  Bullet9 Liberty Garden takes on confiscatory court ruling
  
Now showing!  
The Liberty Garden Movie

Shaw v Santa Cruz County: Shaw Appeals  

Disincentives preclude innovation  
“Because of the Endangered Species Act—what developer or land owner would want to purchase or own the land and do what we are doing? Disincentives preclude innovation. It is no wonder that no o­ne else is following this common sense formulation for success: Pull the weeds and manage the plants and the hydrology.”

- Michael Shaw

Liberty Garden takes on confiscatory court ruling  

“Twenty-five years ago, the Court posited that a regulation of private property ‘effects a taking if [it] does not substantially advance [a] legitimate state interes[t]... Today we correct course.  We hold that the ‘substantially advances’ formula is not a valid takings test, and indeed conclude that it has no proper place in our takings jurisprudence.”

-Ron Zumbrun

Read more>


Login  




 


 Log in Problems?
 New User? Sign Up!

[About Us | Terms of use | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement ]