Welcome to LibertyGarden.com
Search  
Main Menu  

    Printerfriendly display  Printerfriendly display    
Next

Sustainable Development:
Transforming America: Sustainable Development

Abundance Ecology
Shortage Ecology
Political Theory
The Nature of Sustainable Development
The Three E’s of Tyranny
Conditions for Global State Collectivism
Protecting Liberty Before it is Too late
Conclusion
Which World?
  • The Destruction of Your Rights
  • Creating Crisis, Shortage and a Police State

    Achieving Abundance Ecology requires a direct relationship between man and the land. To release the potential productivity and diversity of a landscape, an owner must be free to engage in rigorous disturbance, and free to pursue a reasoned and creative process of trial and error. This process would be suited to the choice of each individual and the uniqueness of each property. In comparison, "Sustainable Development" represents the efforts to eliminate private property in America and to control and limit human action. Sustainable Development is a synonym for "shortage ecology". The philosophy behind the creation of a shortage ecology underlies the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Endangered Species Act is the foundation of the land use element of Sustainable Development. Since the ESA puts the government in control of plants, the ideals of private property are destroyed, natural resource shortages arise, and natural calamities--such as devastating forest fires--increase.

    • Related links:

      Click here to read the full article in PDF>

      Abundance Ecology

      Achieving Abundance Ecology requires a direct relationship between man and the land, Abundance Ecologist Michael Shaw said in a presentation to the Davis Mountains Trans-Pecos Heritage Association annual meeting and conference in Alpine Texas in May 2003. Shaw speaks from experience. Shaw has received acclaim for creating an ecological oasis from a weedy 75 acre parcel o­n the central coast of California--what he calls "Liberty Garden."

      To release the potential productivity and diversity of a landscape, an owner must be free to engage in rigorous disturbance, and free to pursue a reasoned and creative process of trial and error. This process would be suited to the choice of each individual and the uniqueness of each property," Shaw said. The attached article includes key excerpts from Shaw's presentation to the Davis Mountains Trans-Pecos Heritage Association.



          Written by liberty5
      Next

       Printerfriendly display  Printerfriendly display    
        
      Now showing!  
      The Liberty Garden Movie

      Shaw v Santa Cruz County: Shaw Appeals  

      Disincentives preclude innovation  
      “Because of the Endangered Species Act—what developer or land owner would want to purchase or own the land and do what we are doing? Disincentives preclude innovation. It is no wonder that no o­ne else is following this common sense formulation for success: Pull the weeds and manage the plants and the hydrology.”

      - Michael Shaw

      Liberty Garden takes on confiscatory court ruling  

      “Twenty-five years ago, the Court posited that a regulation of private property ‘effects a taking if [it] does not substantially advance [a] legitimate state interes[t]... Today we correct course.  We hold that the ‘substantially advances’ formula is not a valid takings test, and indeed conclude that it has no proper place in our takings jurisprudence.”

      -Ron Zumbrun

      Read more>


      Login  




       


       Log in Problems?
       New User? Sign Up!

      [About Us | Terms of use | Privacy policy | Accessibility statement ]